ClapBackGet your free roast
Free AI UX roast

Roast my portfolio.

For designers and developers, not stock pickers. An AI agent reviews your portfolio the way a hiring manager skimming forty tabs would, then tells you exactly where it loses them.

https://
Roast your own site or a competitor’s · no login, no card required · takes about 2 minutes

A portfolio gets about ten seconds before a reviewer decides to keep reading or close the tab. The work might be great, but if the case studies bury the outcome, the contrast makes the captions unreadable, or the first project is your weakest, that ten seconds goes to waste.

ClapBack reads your portfolio like a cold reviewer and flags what costs you the callback. Maybe the hero doesn't say what you do. Maybe your best case study never states a result, or the project grid makes people dig for the good work. Every note comes with the screenshot and the reason, so you can fix it before the next application instead of after the rejection.

What the roast looks for on a portfolio

Nielsen · Recognition over recall
The 10-second read
Does the top of the page say who you are, what you do, and what you want, before anyone scrolls? Reviewers don't dig; they decide. The roast flags a hero that makes them guess.
Von Restorff Effect · Laws of UX
Lead with your best
The first project is the one everyone sees. If your strongest work is third in the grid and a side project is first, you're spending your one impression badly.
Case-study structure
Outcomes, not just visuals
Pretty mockups with no problem, role, or result read as decoration. The roast checks whether each case study actually tells the story a hiring manager is scanning for.
WCAG 2.2 · 1.4.3 Contrast
Readable captions & body
Designers love light-gray 13px captions. Reviewers over 35, or on a laptop in a bright room, can't read them. It flags the text that fails contrast.
Nielsen · User control & freedom
Navigation & dead ends
A case study with no way back, a resume link that 404s, contact info you have to hunt for. Small frictions like these end a review early.
Doherty Threshold · Laws of UX
Heavy images & load time
Portfolios are image-heavy by nature. A hero that takes six seconds to paint loses the reviewer before your work ever appears.

Questions

Is this for design portfolios or investment portfolios?
Design and developer portfolios, meaning the website where you show your work. It reviews UX, layout, and case-study structure, not stocks or crypto.
Will it critique my actual work or just the site?
It roasts the portfolio as an experience: whether the site presents your work clearly and persuasively to a reviewer. It won't grade your visual taste, but it will tell you where the presentation is getting in the way of it.
How is this different from posting on Reddit for feedback?
You get a structured critique in minutes instead of waiting for replies, every point cites a named UX rule and shows the screenshot, and it won't get distracted arguing about your color choices.
Does it work for Webflow, Framer, and custom sites?
Yes. It uses the live URL like any visitor, so it doesn't matter what you built it with.

Ready for the receipts?

https://
Roast your own site or a competitor’s · no login, no card required · takes about 2 minutes